| Linux hosting5.siteguarding.com 3.10.0-962.3.2.lve1.5.88.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 26 14:06:42 UTC 2025 x86_64 Path : /etc/dante-1.4.3/example/ |
| Current File : //etc/dante-1.4.3/example/socks.conf |
# $Id: socks.conf,v 1.37 2012/06/01 19:59:26 karls Exp $
#
# A sample socks.conf
#
# The config file is divided into two parts; first misc. settings,
# then the routes. Objects in '[]' are optional.
#
#
# recommended order is:
# [debug]
# [logoutput]
# [resolveprotocol]
#
# routes:
# from to via
# [command]
# [extension]
# [protocol]
# [proxyprotocol]
#debug: 1 # uncomment to enable debugging
#logoutput: stdout # users usually don't want to be bothered with that.
# What protocol should be used for resolving hostnames? It's important
# to set this right.
#resolveprotocol: udp # default
#resolveprotocol: tcp # set this if your socks server only supports socksv4.
#resolveprotocol: fake # set this if your clients can't access the DNS server,
# neither directly nor proxied.
#
# the routes
#
# specifying routes for accepting remote connections (via bind()) is
# difficult since we can't know what the "to:" address is
# until we actually get the connection.
# We have two options though:
# a) specify a route for bind (only) first going via the proxy server.
# This will also handle "direct" connections.
# b) specify a route for bind (only) first going "direct".
# This means clients will only be able to accept "direct"
# connections.
# we want to accept remote connections via the proxy server.
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
# command: bind
#}
# or, we do not want to accept remote connections via the proxy server.
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: direct
# command: bind
#}
# if you don't route all local connections via direct, you should
# at least route the DNS server connections via direct connections if you
# can. That can make for much better performance, depending on
# your setup. Make sure the the DNS server line is the first.
#
# Assuming your the DNS server runs on address 10.1.1.1, you can do it like this:
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 10.1.1.1/32 port = domain via: direct
#}
# clients going anywhere else go via server listening at
# IP address 10.1.1.1, port 1080. Note that unless you have
# specified a direct connection for DNS, or the socks server is resolvable
# without network traffic, you can't give a hostname for the socks server,
# you must give a IP address. (the reasons for that are logical enough,
# you would create a loop otherwise.)
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
# protocol: tcp udp # server supports tcp and udp.
# proxyprotocol: socks_v4 socks_v5 # server supports socks v4 and v5.
# method: none #username # we are willing to authenticate via
# # method "none".
#}
# this is identical to the above, but it matches hostnames instead.
# This is if you have clients that are unable to resolve hostnames.
# It can be important that hostname routes come after address routes.
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: . via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
# protocol: tcp udp # server supports tcp and udp.
# proxyprotocol: socks_v4 socks_v5 # server supports socks v4 and v5.
# method: none #username # we are willing to authenticate via
# # method "none".
#}
# identical to above two routes, but using a http proxy instead.
#
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: 10.1.1.1 port = 3128
# command: connect # only thing a http proxy supports.
# proxyprotocol: http
#}
#route {
# from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: . via: 10.1.1.1 port = 3128
# command: connect # only thing a http proxy supports.
# proxyprotocol: http
#}